A be controlled and be more restricted in specific

A current and highly debated issue that continues to grow in our society today is the problem with gun control. Gun violence in the United States is a national problem. Some people take advantage of guns and use the tool with little thought. Countless lives have been lost due to the fact that people have been able to obtain firearms illegally. This is a common issue that will continue if action is not taken as a nation to try and stop it. The gun control debate is fueled by opposing views between those who believe that gun rights should stay the same and individuals with anti-gun views who encourage more restrictions. Guns should be controlled and be more restricted in specific ways. More needs to be done to establish an effective way to control gun violence. Having strong restrictions on guns would ultimately make the world a safer place and save people’s lives. There should be certain restrictions because many innocent lives are lost due to the misuse of guns. Today our world is associated with tragic events, such as mass shootings. These shootings have led to new approaches to reduce gun violence issues in America. Some people have accepted the normality of mass slaughter and believe that there is nothing they can do to change this. According to Dennis Blanco, “Advocates argue that gun control laws reduce the incidence of violent crimes by reducing the prevalence of firearms”(11). There must be restrictions in place for citizens to purchase these weapons. We must limit the amount of firearms available so less gun-related crime will occur. Gun violence can lead civilians to think that no place is considered safe anymore. Recent tragedies that have taken place hold up that statement. In “Public Opinion About Gun Control Post-Sandy Hook,” Kevin Wozniak focuses on how a large number of Americans support making gun control laws more severe. Additionally, the majority of Americans want to prohibit semi-automatic weapons (257). I understand that certain civilians must have a gun in their possession, such as police officers and other law enforcement officers. However, everyday citizens should have restrictions against certain types of guns they own. There is no need to have a powerful weapon such as a fully-automatic assault rifle. These type of weapons are not a necessity and should not be utilized by a normal citizen. By limiting the availability of these harmful and powerful guns, mass shootings and other gun violence levels will decrease. Crime could be prevented if we can get civilians from purchasing illegal guns (Kleck 509). This will not eliminate all gun violence issues but if we make strides it could eventually happen. Laws need to be set in place that will have people abide by the rules and restrictions. There should be laws set to try to regulate who owns guns and why they would need and use them. In America, it is easy to obtain a gun license. It raises concern if civilians can get a assault rifle. They can do whatever they please once it is in their possession, and that ultimately ends with harm. According to, ” Does Gun Control Reduce Violent Crime?” having gun control laws in place will limit crime and violence rates. Having these restrictions is intended to minimize the access of firearms to people who are believed to be at higher risk of causing violence, such as criminals, the mentally ill, or drug addicts (Kleck 489). Civilians should be required to go through background checks and registration to own a gun. Mandatory background checks help to ensure that criminals, mentally ill individuals, or someone who poses a threat to society will not obtain and misuse a firearm but this does not mean that it can not happen. Stricter gun control laws are needed. There are too many guns in our society that are in the hands of criminals. One advantage of having strong gun laws would eliminate the people who are not qualified to possess a gun. Recently, in some cases, guns have gotten into the wrong hands due to the lack of an effective system. Guns are dangerous, and there should be substantial restrictions to control this ongoing issue. Blanco explains, “Gun laws control the types of firearms that may be purchased, designate the qualifications of those who may purchase and own a firearm, and restrict the safe storage and use of firearms. On this view, fewer guns means less crime”(11).  Having unlicensed firearms in the hands of unlawful civilians could cause great danger for people. Gun control supporters want to propose more restrictions and laws to further limit availability and access to firearms. Many people think that there should be less accessibility to guns and firearms; this would likely cause crimes connected to the use of guns to decrease (Blanco 4). We must act and encourage change to help control the gun issues our world faces on a daily basis. We need to come together and recognize how severe the problem has become. The less access to guns, the better. It would make for a much safer environment for all. Intentions of addressing the concern of gun violence in America should be of top priority. Laws are changing often, so gun control laws should be updated. The gun control laws are outdated; in fact, they are as old as the Second Amendment (ProCon 1). The firearms have changed, and so has society. Guns are constantly being modified over time. Firearms were previously different and that is one of the reasons gun control was not a serious issue many years ago. Gun control became necessary throughout history as different types of guns emerged. This is when gun violence started to become a serious issue. As the technology of guns changed over the last hundred years, more people started owning guns. The violence and deaths by guns have risen greatly. When the Second Amendment was adopted, there were no weapons like the assault rifles and many of the advances of modern weapons we have today. In ProCon, it states, ” The right of the general public to carry a concealed firearm in public is not, and never has been, protected by the Second Amendment” (2). The Second Amendment is often misinterpreted by civilians, and it needs to be repealed because it is not up to date. It must be the basis of stricter laws. On the other hand, however, others argue that there is no need for more enforced restrictions on guns. These supporters say that it is not the guns that are the issue, it is the people. In the words of Dennis Blanco, one of the view’s main proponents, “The pro-gun society which refutes the notion that carrying guns and firearms are not necessarily the primary factor in the occurrences of crimes, it is the user and owner of the gun” (2). According to this view, guns should not be restricted because they are not the real issue. It is the responsibility of owners to be educated to understand the gun ownership regulations. People are responsible for the crimes, not the guns themselves. As the saying goes, guns do not kill people; people kill people. Taking guns away from United States citizens that use them for many reasons such as, shooting practice, competition, hunting and self-defense is not the solution. Law abiding citizens should not be punished for the criminals that misuse these weapons. Stricter gun control infringes on the right to own guns for personal enjoyment (ProCon 3). Taking away all privately owned guns is not the answer. It would not be a more secure society if assault weapons were eliminated. People could replace those weapons with non-assault rifles that operate the same way as regular weapons (Davidson 2). In sum, then, the issue is even if guns have more restrictions, it will not help the issue of gun violence. The people need to be educated on how to use firearms. I concede that in some circumstances it may be the people more than guns causing the violence and harm. There is no simple and effective way to control gun crime and violence. However, I still maintain that there must be an established plan developed to help control the gun violence that is occurring. We should take action to stop the numbers from rising due to gun violence. Incidents of gun violence continually seem to rise. As proven with statistics, in 2014, 67.9% of homicides, 40.3% of robberies, and 22.5% of assaults were committed by criminals with guns (Kleck 1). On the issue of gun violence, the U.S. leads in number of deaths (Kleck 1). Since guns are becoming more available, that means more crimes could be committed. Although some might object this view, I would reply that gun violence is a serious issue that can only be solved by having certain restrictions in place to limit violence in our world. The world has many problems because of guns. We should have secure restrictions and regulations. Gun control should be enforced properly. The current gun laws must be enforced and new ones must be created. When actions are taken to help this ongoing issue our world faces, it could create beneficial changes. By imposing restrictions on gun use in our society, it could potentially reduce mass shootings, deaths and violence rates. Without gun control, a gun can get in the hands of the wrong individual and cause dangerous situations. Several areas around the U.S. have been affected by the reckless acts of people with the use of firearms. Guns have the ability to affect everyone is some way. In today’s society, more and more people are being affected by the lack of gun control in our country. It could be the lives of our family member, our loved ones, or our friends that are lost due to the extremely prominent problem. The goal is to find an effective way to reduce gun violence. Gun control is necessary in order for us to live in a safe place. The danger that comes with guns proves that stricter gun laws need to be enacted.