The for independence. During the popular-political movements known as

The reasons for the illegality of Kurdistan’s independenceQuebec province in Canada with an area of ??1.5 million square kilometers and a population of over 8 million people with a French majority (83 percent of the French speaking population) has always called for independence. During the popular-political movements known as the “Quiet Revolution” in the 1960s and 1970s, nationalism and nationalism peaked in Quebec, and held independence referenda with the coming of the “Parti Québécois” and the government of the Quebec province. In the 1980 referendum, about 59.5 percent of the voters voted against the independence of Quebec, and in the 1995 referendum only 50.5 percent voted against the Quebec independence with a very slight disagreement. In 1998, the Canadian government asked the Supreme Court to advise that Québec’s unilateral independence in the constitution and international law is legal? The Canadian High Court concluded that this independence is unconlicted with the Canadian Constitution, given the rule of democratic rule and, at the same time, the federalism on Canada and the implementation of many minority rights. From the point of view of international law, the Supreme Court of Canada has clarified the terms of separation and independence; in the court of law, “the people of Quebec have many” people “funds and there is no need to discuss it … Legal separation only the right to determine The fate of international law is meaningful and when a “people” are under colonization or subjugation and exploitation of aliens. ” The Supreme Court also has the right to exercise the right of self-determination in the same way as two sources: the nations that are colonized or occupied by foreigners have the right to independence, not any ethnic group, even though they have the characteristics of a “people” in rights. To beSome argue that international law is constantly evolving, and, in response to the new imposition, it is necessary to consider new rules for it, for example, when no nation is under colonialism or foreign domination, there must be a comprehensive interpretation of “one people” and their rights But they can achieve the right to their own foreign destiny, independence. Presenters believe that international relations, not the traditional areas of international law, are on the rise. International law places discipline on the will of governmentsGoogle Translate for Business:Translator ToolkitWebsite Translator